Custom tooling manufacturer · process improvement
Three production lines with qualifying process-improvement and custom tooling activity. Federal and SC state credits coordinated.
Alexander & Blake helps South Carolina companies and their CPA firms identify, document, and defend qualifying R&D activities under §41. Our work is technical, conservatively scoped, and built to survive examination.
We treat the credit as a tax position, not a refund. Every engagement begins with a structured technical interview, a wage allocation review, and a Section 174 cross-check before any benefit is computed.
Our deliverable is the file your examiner sees: a defensible narrative tied to contemporaneous records and reviewed by a principal.
“Conservative numbers, thorough files, and someone who answers the phone when the IDR letter arrives.”Composite · Drawn From CPA Partner Feedback
Four-part qualification, ASC and Regular method modeling, and contemporaneous documentation aligned to project records.
South Carolina R&D credit coordinated with the federal benefit through a single study process.
SRE identification, amortization scheduling, and interaction modeling with the §41 credit and §280C election.
IDR response drafting, examiner correspondence, and documentation assistance for prior-year claims.
Project-level disclosure preparation for the expanded Section G reporting now required — built for CPA firms supporting their clients.
Engagement delivered behind your firm's letterhead — our team executes the study, you own the client relationship.
CNC, additive, fixture design. Process improvement frequently qualifies under the four-part test.
Internal-use exclusion analysis and project-by-project substantiation for development teams.
Means-and-methods innovation, MEP coordination, and value-engineering activities.
Recipe development, shelf-life work, and packaging engineering — narrow but real.
Schematic-through-CD work where uncertainty drives iterative design — frequently overlooked.
Dyeing processes, material testing, and production-line optimization for SC's textile sector.
Qualifying first-article work, tooling design, and process validation for OEM programs.
Verification, validation, and regulatory iteration treated as qualified development activities.
Three production lines with qualifying process-improvement and custom tooling activity. Federal and SC state credits coordinated.
Three-year lookback plus current year. Client had never claimed — believed only pharmaceutical companies qualified.
Qualifying activities in structural design, simulation, and prototype development. Study completed in 45 days.
They treated our credit like a tax position, not a refund. The file they prepared was thorough, organized, and built to withstand review.
No fee, no obligation. We will review your activities, identify the qualifying surface, and tell you plainly whether an engagement makes sense. If not, we will say so.